|If it looks like the Drug Rundown is complete without you having to run off all the
drugs, what you need to do is D of P interview and check for the five EPs of the Drug Rundown which are:
||the person has come to present time,|
||their imaginary, past and present tracks have split apart,|
||they have cognited on what, other than present, past time and space they have been
located in (you are not just running off pictures of the past, you are actually recovering them from another time and space),|
||they have found their own personal why for why they have been taking drugs,|
||all their chronic somatics and hidden things which have caused them to reach for the
drugs as a solution have been discovered and eradicated.|
In other words, they no longer have chronic somatics that the drugs are a solution
to. This fifth EP would also include no more desire to take the drugs. If they say yes to all this on the meter, then it's
a done deal.
You should, before letting them attest that the rundown is complete, call the whole
set of drugs on the drug list (putting in suppress and inval on the list, so you get to call the list three times). If there
is no read, then have them locate the area on the time track prior to taking drugs, spotting that, and then, do a preassessment
on that. If that is still dry, then you get an attestation, you have a completed Drug Rundown. So, you get them to sign that
it is complete and write up their wins.
Now, if this doesn't happen somewhere along the line in the Drug Rundown and you get
to run all the chronic somatics connected with each one of the drugs and each one of the combos, what you would then do is
a Prior Assessment. A Prior Assessment is simply having them spot the time prior to taking drugs or alcohol and then do a
preassessment on that. In other words, as of that period of time you do a preassessment and would treat that period of time
as just one more drug That should produce the EP of the Drug Rundown.
After the Drug Rundown is over, if you have a whole lot of Ev Purps (evil purposes)
that came off during it, you can then put in your XDN, This is done about a third of the time and I'll be covering it later.
What your normal next step is to do an Expanded ARC Straightwire Quad.
Before we proceed with the Straightwire, there are a couple of things I'd like to double
back on and clear up. Before auditing anyone that is brand new, coming in the door, you should clear the words Scientology,
Dianetics, auditing, case, process E-meter, auditor, Grade Chart, you should demonstrate the E-meter, you should define charge
and demonstrate charge. What they should know basically is what truth is, that the axioms exist, explain the awareness scale,
demonstrate an auditing comm. cycle, explain what a PrepCheck is, and you should clear Scientology axioms 1, 2, 3, 11, 30,
32, 38, and 51 and Dianetic Axioms 90 - 98, 123, and 180 - 187, I just wanted to get that cleared up as far as specifically
what you do on a pc before them having their first session.
The next thing I want to double back on is to explain why a Drug Rundown is done. When
a person is under drugs they are under threat because the body is threatened by the drugs. So, when threatened with the body
unmocking, in other words, harm coming to the body, a thetan will mock up obsessively. If a person takes a drug, the body
feels threatened and the pc reacts by mocking up some bank hard below his awareness level. Drugs, whether it is LSD, marijuana,
alcohol, or whatever, produces a threat to the body, like any other poison. The threat is to the body and the thetan reacts
by mocking up. He can either mock up an engram, secondary or some combination of fantasy and fact. In some cases, he will
mock it up so hard that it will become more real and safer than PT. Thus, under threat, he goes out of PT. A person who needs
a Drug Rundown, a person that has taken drugs in other words, have a time track that is not make up of wholly present time
events. It is a composite of past track, imagination and present events. Thus, right before your eyes, the person is apparently
in the same room as you are, doing the same things you are, but from his point of view, he is really only partially there
and he is partially back in some past events, He seems to be there, but he isn't really fully tracking with PT. What is constant
in this is that he is not running the same series of events as other people.
One other thing I might add is that there are other things which act like a drug and
you can add them to the list and while your pc is doing the Drug Rundown, he may originate more drugs he wants to add to the
list, so you just add them to the list. Any activity which is obsessive, addictive, drives the person out of PT, turns on
imagination, and a person feels is a drug for them should be listed. If it acts like a drug, it should be listed and run under
the Drug Rundown, whether that item be sex, romance, love, driving automobiles fast, money, working, or whatever, There are
a lot of workaholics in society and they can't live without it. In fact, within the first three years after a person retires,
if they are age 60 or over, half of them die. They just can't live without work.
The other thing I wanted to clear up is I used a process name very quickly, R3R, in
running out the chronic somatics and emotions and also under the giving and taking drug chains.
R3R is a process whereby an engram chain is run out. There have been many versions
of it, many repair lists on it, and many styles of it published, cancelled, and then republished. It has been a point of discussion
probably for over 30 years within Hubbard's writings. However, the proper way to erase an engram is as follows.
You simply use the R3R technique on all four flows and, of course, you check the flow
for a read and if the flow reads then you run it. Your exact command, say we are using the "lousy attitude" as an example,
1st flow, your first step of R3R is "Locate an incident of another causing you to have a lousy attitude." If it was
2nd flow, the command would be "Locate an incident of you causing another to have a lousy attitude." If it was
flow, the exact command would be "Locate an incident of another causing others to have lousy attitudes." If it was 4th flow,
also known as flow zero, in other words, self to self, the command would be "Locate an incident of you causing yourself to
have a lousy attitude."
The phrase "to have" should always be in there because a case is nothing but a havingness
and you are looking for a permanent havingness. Within the churches and within the writings of L. Ron Hubbard, the command
would be "Locate an incident of you causing yourself a lousy attitude." From that, of course, you would get display bank instead
of permanent bank. The majority of the reactive mind is display bank and is only temporarily restimulated and it is not worth
auditing. The minority of the reactive mind is in permanent restimulation and completely overwhelms an individual and that
is what you are interested in auditing. That is why you give the proper command.
So, that is the first step of R3R: "Locate an incident..."
After they have nodded or said that they have or there is evidence that they have done
so, you would ask them, "When was it?" They would give you some time, when it was. Say they give you "1942". You acknowledge
and you tell them to "Move to that incident", that is your third command. You don't say the , you say that
. -Move to that incident. When they have indicated that they have, you say, "What is the duration of that incident?" They
tell you "Well, 8 minutes." The date and the duration are filed under the file clerk (a mechanism in the mind) and the purposes
of these steps are to assist in turning on visio. That was your fourth step, getting the duration. So, your fifth step is,
you tell them "Move to the beginning of that incident." As you do that your needle will fall on the E- meter. Then, if their
eyes are not already closed, you would say "Close your eyes, please" and after they have, you ask "What do you see?" They
say, "A tank." You acknowledge it. So, then you give the seventh command of R3R, and you write them down on the worksheets
this way as you are moving along , 1 , 2 , 3 , etc. ., "Move through that incident to a point 8 minutes later." In other words,
at step seven you always put in whatever duration they gave you on step four. If they talk or originate anything while they
are moving through you say, "Okay, continue", which would be your eighth step. If they are completely silent, wait until they
look up and they have gone through to the end of it. Then, your ninth step is to ask "What happened?" On this ninth step they
will run the lock of re experiencing it in this session, of course, but they will tell you what happened in the incident.
For instance, they will say "A tank came to me, or towards me, and ran me down and I had a lousy attitude in it at the time
and it stuck me, stuck the attitude on me and I died there." You would acknowledge that, then you would give the next step
of R3R which is, we'll abbreviate it as, A/B, which is two commands at once, you would say "Move to the beginning of that
incident, tell me when you are there." They would nod and indicate that they have. Then, you would write step C down, which
would be "Move through to the end of that incident." They would, then you would give the step D which is "Tell me what happened."
Then they would tell you what happened on that pass through the incident.
If the TA has gone severely up quite a bit, you can then ask "Is it erasing or going
more solid?" You can write E/S on your worksheets and just circle the one which it is. If they say that it is erasing, you
put them through the incident again using the steps A, B, C, and D and have them keep going through the incident as long as
it is erasing until it is erased, When it has erased you will have a FN, floating needle, VGIs (very good indicators), they
will be grinning and smiling, cognition, then the chain itself will erase and you can verify that it is erased.
If the incident at any point starts to go more solid, you can ask "Is there an earlier
incident of another causing you to have a lousy attitude?" If they say no, you can check"Does the one we are running have
an earlier beginning?" These are the only commands you use in R3R, Steps 1 - 9, A, B, C and D. If you have some question as
to whether it is erasing or going more solid, then you can ask. If there is no earlier incident, and it is going more solid,
then you can ask for an earlier beginning. You go through the incident as many times as necessary to where the engram is erased,
the incident is erased. The reason you are doing this is to get this stuck, chronic, fixed lousy attitude off the individual.
After the first flow is erased, you check the 2nd flow by asking "Is there an incident
of you causing another to have a lousy attitude?" If it reads, you would run it. If it doesn't read, you ask "On that question
has anything been suppressed?", "Has anything been invalidated?" If both those are clean, you don't run it. If there is a
read on either, you would run the 2nd flow. Likewise, 3rd and 4th flows.
After all the flows are either run or verified, you then check the attitude itself,
"A lousy attitude", "On that has anything been suppressed?" "Has anything been invalidated?" That being clean and the needle
floating, you then ask the pc "Is that handled and erased for you?" That being verified it is a done deal.
That is R3R procedure, whether you are running attitudes, emotions, intentions or whatever.
There are a couple of things I want to say about Dianetics. There are volumes and volumes
written by Hubbard on this, and it is more controversial and more confusing and more difficult than I'd care to discuss. Such
remarks are made as "If the TA goes up automatically send the pc earlier", this is absolutely wrong. Your pc should be hatted,
in other words, he should understand that you are looking for the basic incident on a chain. That is what should come
up on the first incident that comes up. If a chain is heavily charged, you may have to go earlier a few times, but this is
at the most, 30% of the time. The rest of the time they will be going directly to the basic incident. In most cases, (70%
of the time) - they will be going directly to the basic incident. In fact, a third of the pc's never have to be sent earlier,
They go right to the basic incident. With a very rough case, you will have to go earlier about 30% of the time, many times
the TA is going up simply because they have not gotten all of the incident that they are going through, so, it is absolutely
ludicrous to send someone earlier because their TA has gone up on a couple passes through an engram. Different parts of the
engram will come off on each pass.
I wanted to clear that up. If you would simply keep it simple and if you have any doubts
of whether it is erasing or going solid, ask. If it is going solid, ask for an earlier, If they say that there is no earlier,
then ask for an earlier beginning. It is actually that simple.
You may have to take a lot of passes on a heavy engram, like dozens of times, and you
may have to ask for earlier beginnings dozens of times, and different somatic strips may come off on each pass. It is basically
that the overall engram is developing and you are getting all of the charge off.
R3R procedure is used in Dianetics, XDN, New Era Dianetics, and Drug Rundowns to erase
incidents. Your pc should be hatted that locks are preceded by secondaries which are preceded by engrams. There is more case
gain that is had by running secondaries than engrams. If your pc runs a big, heavy secondary, go ahead and let him have his
win, but the next day go and get the underlying engram off.
In doing Dianetics, you are doing R3R; and in doing Scientology you are doing repetitive
processes: you ask a question, get an answer, acknowledge it, and keep asking the question until all the change is run out
of that particular process, and the person has come up to realising the truth on that particular subject matter, and that
subject is handled for him forever.
Quad, meaning four flows, ARC Straightwire is done right after the Drug Rundown. So,
we will go over how it is done and what is done in it.
Straightwire is a part of the 0-4 Expanded Grade processes which are about 800 processes
which are repetitive processes. Within the church, people who do these are generally ridiculed "as grades being a terribly
easy thing to do". I don't particularly agree with that opinion. I think that they require the most talent. But if
you were to add all the processes together on ARC Straightwire and all your grades, you would have the 800 fixed rules and
laws of life.
A person in very good shape has about 600 of these down cold and about 200 of them
they aren't even aware that they exist anymore and a good half dozen they have completely backwards Most people are not in
that good shape.
I'm just going to go over the processes explaining how you run them and what normally
comes off, There is no point in my saying -to EP 800 times, I'll just list the processes:
||Recall a time.|
||Recall a communication.|
||This is a four flow process:|
1st flow: "What would you like to confront?"
flow: "What would another like to confront?"
3rd flow: "What would others like to confront?"
4th flow: "What would you
like to confront in yourself?"
You run each of those separately and individually, repetitively to EP. This now brings
up the subject of whether you want to do these things the way they are published and printed by the churches or if you want
to do them correctly.
The word "what" starts a listing question and about half of the processes in Scientology
are listing type questions. So, what happens in running a process is you either get a list end phenomena or you get a process
end phenomena. Either way you are leaving someone with something unflat. They will either have an unflat list or they will
have an unflat process. You will get an FN, VGIs, cog, but they will be left with immense quantities of by-passed charge.
It can actually be very cruel to run these things they way they are published. It is very difficult on a person. There are
two alternatives. You can either run the process to both EPs, for instance, this first one, "What would you like to confront?".
You could run that to the list EP. For example, say you are auditing some girl and she gets a big cog and it blows down and
the needle floats, in other words, she gets her list item saying she would like to confront her bank and get her case handled.
You could continue to run the process until you get the EP of the process. The EP of this particular process is that a person
would normally get a cog on affinity itself.
They would realise that what they like to confront is what they end up confronting,
and what they don't like to confront, they don't end up confronting, thus it is the sentimental whims that are determining
what they face in life, so they are being run by emotions. That would be a normal, acceptable level EP. This process should
be run to that type EP.
You could go through the folders of people who have been processed under this -What
would you like to confront? and the majority of them are just going to come up with their list item and these people continue
to walk around having their emotions controlling what they face.
Continuing the process beyond the list item is one solution. You could take every "what"
process in Scientology to the two EPs since you are doing two things at once with them.
If any outsider were to come along and say that this is really not what is happening,
people don't actually list off these, that person is crazy. that person belongs in a mental ward because the pcs do list off
of them. You can take any folder that has had these 800 processes run and correct the 300 - 400 lists there or correct the
300 - 400 processes. They either have 300 - 400 underrun processes or they have 300 - 400 incomplete lists.
It is because of technical errors like this that 99% of the people involved with the
Scientology movement want to be auditors, but they don't want to be pc's. The auditing has been such a traumatic incident
for them that they are just going into a winning valence on it.
The second way you could resolve this particular issue is to ask a rational question
and not use the word -what, and I find that a much more logical alternative instead of double processing areas and getting
involved with listing and nulling phenomena.
So, the proper way to run the fourth process is:
|Tell me something you would like to confront.|
Tell me something another
would like to confront.
Tell me something others would like to confront.
Tell me something you would like to confront
Doubling back, this first process, "Remember something", if they come off with a nonsequitur
EP, they don't get any cog on memory itself, it is up to your adjudication whether you want to leave it at that. I would take
the process to where they get a cog on memory.
On "Recall a time", the normal EP for that is they would pop right out of an incident.
On "Recall a communication", they would pop out of another incident. You should get
sequitur cogs on these four "Like to confront" processes.
||Tell me a part of your life you would be willing to re experience. |
is run alternately with)
Tell me a part of the future you would be willing to experience.
You run the first command, get an answer, acknowledge it, then run the second command,
get an answer, and acknowledge, back and forth. So, it is run alternately to the EP which is FN, VGIs and cog, and the subject
is handled for all time. They have it down cold. They are analytical on it. If you just use FN, VGIs, cog, as an EP, you are
going to a shallow run and you are not really clearing anyone. That is another thing which is wrong with what is going on
with the churches and what is published in Scientology technology. In running engrams or Dianetics, you should always get
a fourth EP (which is an erasure) and your fifth EP (that one word you are erasing does resolve the chain subject matter).
If you are running a spinning feeling off someone and after you have verified that the spinning feeling chain is erased, you
should get your fifth EP and make sure that the spinning feeling is erased, they don't have the feeling anymore. The reason
you do that is to make sure that you have the right chain, they might have two chains that cause them to have a spinning feeling
or even five. If the pc starts listing items like fear, I doubt if every fear they have in existence is caused by one engram
chain, there is going to be more than one. In running grades, you don't just take F/N, VGIs, cog, you make sure that the process
is flat, that they understand they subject matter and that they are at cause on it.
||(You don't use the words "think of", that will turn on analytical machinery,
you want to run recall.) Recall something you wouldn't mind forgetting yourself.|
Recall something you wouldn't mind forgetting
(This is a six-way bracket. They give you an answer, you acknowledge it, then you run the second command, they
give you an answer, you acknowledge it, the third, etc. It is 1 - 6, 1 - 6, etc.,) Recall something you wouldn't mind another
Recall something you wouldn't mind forgetting about another.
Recall something you wouldn't mind
another forgetting about you.
Recall something you wouldn't mind other people forgetting.
Recall something you wouldn't
mind another person forgetting about another person.
||Tell me something that would be all right for another to make forgotten.
Repetitive to EP. |
Tell me something that would be all right for you to make forgotten.
Tell me something that would
be all right for others to make forgotten.
Tell me something that would be all right for you to make forgotten about yourself.
||Tell me something that another would permit to have happen again. Repetitive
to EP. |
Tell me something that you would permit to have happen again.
Tell me something that others would permit to
have happen again.
Tell me something that you would permit to have happen to yourself again.
||Recall an unconsciousness. Repetitive to EP.|
Recall a symbol.
Recall an effort.
Recall knowing about.
Recall not knowing.
||Then you would rehab how many times they went release on doing the Self-Analysis
on the Drug Rundown.|
||Then you run the final processes for the level.|
Recall a time that
was really real to you, (They give an answer, you acknowledge, and go to the next command.) Recall a time someone was in good
communication with you.
(They give an answer, you acknowledge, and go to the next command.) Recall a time someone really
felt affinity for you. (They give an answer, you acknowledge, and go to the next command.) Recall a time another knew he/she
understood you. (You run those four in that order repetitively to EP.)
2nd flow: (Run alternately as above.)
a time that was really real to another.
Recall a time you were in good communication with someone.
Recall a time you
really felt affinity for someone.
Recall a time you knew you understood someone.
3rd flow: (Run alternately as above.)
a time that was really real for others.
Recall a time another was in good communication with others.
Recall a time
another really felt affinity for others.
Recall a time another knew he/she understood others.
4th flow: (Run alternately
Recall a time you were really real to yourself.
Recall a time you were in good communication with yourself.
Recall a time you really felt affinity for yourself.
Recall a time you knew you understood yourself.
||The final four processes for the level are four flows of adjustment in
havingness. Run repetitive to EP.|
1st flow: Look around here and find something that is really real to you.
Look around here and find something that would be really real to another.
3rd flow: Look around here and find something
that would be really real to others.
4th flow: Look around here and find something you could make really real to yourself.
Then, you close off the session and have them look at the Grade Chart to see if they
have attained the particular EP for the grade which is they are aware, they have reached the awareness of hope, they are aware
of hope, they have gained the ability that they know they are not going to get worse, and they have attained freedom from
deterioration because some of that has been handled. Then, you have them attest that they have attained that particular state.
Ask if there are any doubts or reservations that they have on it. Then, have they write up a success story (so they acknowledge
themselves), their wins on it. After they have done that you check on the meter with them on their success story "Would you
like for others to have gains similar to yours?" Write down their answer and acknowledge their FN. That is how you complete
any particular level.
On the Life Repair level, you would have them verify that they have attained the awareness
level of demand for improvement, they are free from no hope for change or future and that they have attained an awareness
of truth and the way to personal freedom. So, that is how you acknowledge that a person has completed a level.
Now that their Expanded Straightwire is done, you can now do their Dianetics, or Standard
Dianetics, or New Era Dianetics. Regardless of the many names that have been assigned towards cleaning up what remaining engram
chains are on the case, here is where you do their Dianetics.
You take the original assessment sheet for the pc, which you did either when they came
in or on the Drug Rundown step because you will be using it shortly. You ask them "Have you lost anything?" as your first
step in Dianetics, and anything they give you run it out R3R. If it is terribly evident that they are in a secondary or that
there is a large secondary on the case, this is where it will run best.
Next, you take the original assessment sheet, go to page 2 (which is your most critical
page), go to line 15. under upsets: "Are you particularly upset with or cross about anything or anyone at this particular
time?". If you have any reading item there, you treat it the same way you would treat a drug on the Drug R/D. Say they said
their upset with their Dad and it was 1962. You take that particular upset and do a preassessment on it, in other words, you
call "Are there any pains connected with your upset with your Dad?" "Are there any sensations connected with your upset with
your Dad?" and so forth. You call that list down and then you treat it the same way you would a drug, you take those that
read, get them to list out all the chronic somatics connected, then you R3R off everything that was reading, those that didn't
read, you check for a read putting suppress and inval in on them. After it is all over, check "Upset with Dad" and put suppress
and inval in on it as questions.
Everything else that is on the form that reads, you are going to ask "Are you interested
in running it?" If they are and it reads, you are going to run it out simply as an incident. So, that is how you handle everything
on the original assessment sheet, or "the pc assessment sheet", however you want to name it. Then do the "Prepared Assessment
R/D" in Appendix.
After that action is done, you can ask the pc "Do you have any disabilities?" by clearing
that a disability is not a "wants to achieve", but it is something negative that is sitting there. For instance, you don't
want a pc to list the disability of "not having a million dollars" because that is a wants to achieve, but a pc listing a
disability of "the inability to see beyond ten feet without my glasses" something like that, you would go ahead and run.
After that you ask the pc, "Is there anything that you haven't wanted to be?". Get
a list, anything that reads, R3R out.
After that, "Is there anything that you haven't wanted to do?". After that, of course,
you would get a list and run everything out that read, R3R. Those that didn't read, you would check (after everything that
had read was run out) with suppress and inval.
After that, you would ask "Is there anything that you haven't wanted to have?". As
with any question in Dianetics, you would list it down to an FN. If it didn't FN, you would say "I'd like to extend the list"
and just wait it out and get all the items on the sheet.
The last thing that you do is ask "Is there anything you haven't wanted to experience?".
Get a list and R3R those out If your pc, prior to this particular point in Dianetics, achieves a state of happy, well, human
being and wants to attest his Dianetics is complete, you can verify that these other rundowns don't read on the E-meter. If
they do read, you go ahead and extend and run to where all these rundowns are done. This is the normal point for stopping
If a person still hasn't made the state of Dianetics Case Completion (which according
to the Grade Chart is defined as a person attains freedom from physical pain and misemotion and attains the state of well
and happy human being and becomes aware of help), then the way you can achieve the EP for the level is to run open-wide R3R
commands of locks, secondaries and engrams. The specific commands are:
||Locate an incident of another causing you to have a momentary restimulation
of an engram chain.|
||Locate an incident of you causing another to have a momentary restimulation
of an engram chain.|
||Locate an incident of another causing others to have momentary restimulations
of an engram chain.|
||Locate an incident of you causing yourself to have momentary restimulation
of an engram chain.|
Those would be your commands for a wide-open question on locks.
The four secondary commands are:
||Locate an incident of another causing you to have loss or misemotion.|
||Locate an incident of you causing another to have loss or misemotion.|
||Locate an incident of another causing others to have losses and misemotions.|
||Locate an incident of you causing yourself to have loss or misemotion|
The four engram chains are:
||Locate an incident of another causing you to have pain and unconsciousness.|
||Locate an incident of you causing another to have pain and unconsciousness.|
||Locate an incident of another causing others to have pains and unconsciousnesses.|
||Locate an incident of you causing yourself to have pain and unconsciousness.|
If they haven't attained the Dianetic EP already, these wide-open commands will clean
off whatever is sitting on top of them.
It would release the entire engram bank. It is a very nice state and a very nice cherry
on top of the dessert to do this last technical action. So, that would complete the Dianetics.
There are few instances where you might want to do XDN at this point, but I would try
to counsel against it. XDN is a technology in itself of cleaning the evil out of people using R3R. It is best run after the
Drug Rundown or at the end of the Bridge or if they walk in completely crazy, run it right at the beginning. Those are the
three points where you can run it.
I'd like to take up Expanded Dianetics (XDN) here because sometimes it is run after
the Drug Rundown where it is very obvious that they are in XDN material, (in other words, evil purposes (Ev Purps) are bothering
them more than being stupid). The grades handle stupidity and Ev Purps are handled by R3R. Of course, if they come in crazy,
they are crazy because of the over restimulation of the Ev Purps which has caused them to introspect and list and that turns
on the circuits out of their engrams and that is technically what mentally happens on someone that is insane, nutty, psychotic,
or super-wound-up like a good 10 - 20% of the people in this society.
If there were over 100 reading Ev Purps that came off on the Drug Rundown, you do XDN
after the Drug Rundown.
One could define XDN as the use of Dianetics in a personal sense, in a tailored fashion,
to eradicate a person from restraining himself. This comes about by getting their Ev Purps off and erased. They will restrain
themselves from committing evil deeds because they are basically good. Ev Purps get stuck on an individual because they had
them at impact, the same way an attitude gets stuck on an individual. They received an engram at the time that they were thinking
that particular thought. For instance, if someone had an idea "I just want to kill everyone" at the time a bullet passes through
their skull and then later he is in a classroom as a child when he feels this urge and this intention "to kill everyone",
he will restrain himself. He will remove himself from the other children in the playground because he has that Ev Purp.
The R3R commands in running Ev Purps out are, if on the purpose that I listed -to kill
||Locate an incident of another causing you to have the intention to kill
||Locate an incident of you causing another to have the intention to kill
||Locate an incident of another causing others to have the intentions to
||Locate an incident of you causing yourself to have the intention to kill
So, those are the R3R commands, As far as finding what Ev Purps are on a person, there
are a number of ways to do this and a specific order of doing that. So, we will take that up now.
To make a person well, sane, where they have no evil, to make them whole, to make them
free from restraint, to where they can operate comfortably at their own capability level, that is what an XDN Case Completion
is. You have to run all the compulsive, engramic evil purposes off of their case. You will know that people have these things
because when you are auditing them on the Drug Rundown or PrepChecks or whatever previous auditing you have done a person,
they will start stating evil purposes and they will start reading on the E-meter. Anytime that happens you draw a circle around
the Ev Purp and you mark the read. If your pc is running out an engram on the Drug Rundown and he says, "Well, gee, while
the bullet came through my head, I wanted to kill everyone", this happens to be on an engram chain of "hostile emotion" that
you are running off the guy. You circle "to kill everyone" and mark LF (long fall) on that on your worksheets in your administration,
your paperwork that you are keeping.
Where they just walk in and the person is really nuts and evil, you give them an Introspection
Rundown which I will be explaining later on. In that case, you won't have any worksheets to pull these things off.
Normally the XDN is done after the Drug Rundown (or OT VII). So, you go through the
folder and list out (on sheets of paper), in order every purp that has come off in all of their sessions. You go through the
worksheets and list out all the Ev Purps.
An Ev Purp is a purpose that is stated. Your own personal definition of evil should
not be a determining factor. If they start printing things like "to feel wonderful" or "to be happy" and those purposes are
reading, you circle them and mark them down, You are only going to find out if they are evil or not in the XDN. If they have
reading purps, you mark them down, whether it looks evil to you or not, because you can clear up with the pc whether it is
evil in doing the XDN. So, you mark down all the evil purposes in your auditing and circle them at all times when you are
auditing another person.
One other phenomena that you should always mark on your work-sheets and circle are
rocket reads (RR), Ser Facs, and rock slams (RS). You should mark a RS when it starts RSing and draw a line down through everything
that they have said and mark when the RS turns off because later, when you come back through for the XDN, you will address
that material. Each of these things indicate that there is some evil content there that should be erased off by R3R.
So, after you have a full list where you have all the Ev Purps that they have listed
off in session that have read, the first thing you do in XDN is start a session and define evil with the pc as something that
is either against social mores or is harmful to another or others. Then, ask if this first purp as listed, is evil and check
it for a read. If it reads, then you run the four flows off of it to where the evil purp is erased. Naturally, if some of
the flows don't read, you don't run them. After that is done, you go to the next purp and so on completely down the list.
You wouldn't take up any of the RS items at this time. Basically, you would run off all the reading purposes that the case
has given off in the order that they gave them off. So, you would run off all the reading purps and any volunteered purps
that have come off in their previous auditing, but you wouldn't address any Ser Facs or RSes or anything other than reading
purposes. If they want to reword these purps, you can check and make sure the wording is perfect, or if there is an underlying
purp underneath it, the one that they have listed. Make sure you get your pronouns correct, just a change of wording, can
make it a completely different purp, such as, "to kill him", "to kill her", or to "kill them" are three different purps.
As they run these off, their whole idea of evil will start changing and that is normal.
What you are dealing with here is you are trying to handle the left side of the personality
graph on a being. A personality graph at the top, (this is right out of Indian philosophy and a number of religions), on the
left side of any personality graph, you would normally find the column "stable" at the top and "unstable-dispersed" at the
bottom, zero at the middle, +100 at the top, and -100 at the bottom.
Second column, Happy at the top, Depressed at the bottom, Third column, Composed at
the top, Nervous at the bottom. Fourth column, Personable at the top, Undependable at the bottom. Fifth column, Active at
the top, Reactively Retarded at bottom.
So, these first five columns on the left are known as the left side and this can basically
be summarised as how an individual feels about himself. They can make the left side in just running these purps out that they
have given off. If they do, there will be a remarkable change. You should show them the personality graph and if they feel
that they have made the left side, get an attestation.
The rest of the graph is called the right side. They are (top, bottom): Capable - Inhibited:
Responsible - Irresponsible: Logical - Capacity for Error - Hypercritical: Appreciative - Lack of Accord: Comm. level Withdrawn.
If they still haven't made the left side after running off their purps, then you can
give them a new pc assessment sheet or original assessment sheet phrasing each question "Has there emotional stress on this?"
to where you are looking for emotional stress and those that read, run it out. You get some pretty profound answers on this
because when you ask questions like "Are there any losses in your life that severely affected it or any high emotional stress
moments?", they will come up with some pretty wild stuff that pops right up on them like with some pretty wild stuff that
pops right up on them like "They lost what they cared about", something like that. They will give you an item and you go ahead
and run it out.
So, after you have cleaned off the emotional stress from the pc assessment sheet, then
you can recall your three LX lists and anything that reads three times, run it. It doesn't matter if they have or haven't
been done before.
The next thing you do after that (if they still haven't made the left side) is the
Environmental Rundown. You ask them, "What terminals make up your environment?" If they start listing dogs, cats and jobs,
take it, whatever terminals. This is subjective. Then, you take whichever terminals read and get a list of evil purposes,
"What evil purposes are connected with (this terminal)?", and then run all those out.
After you have handled all the reads on the terminal list (of course, the terminal
list should F/N), then you have the evil purposes off the environment, They would have made the left side by now.
Whenever they do make the left side, you go over to the right side and do a Vital Information
Rundown. You assess vital information, truth, and data. On what ever read best, ask for moments where they withheld this under
duress. Phrase the question to run an engram, in other words, "Locate a time containing pain and unconsciousness when another
caused you to withhold truth.", if truth was the one that read. If vital information read, you would use that. You run out
the withholding of whatever read on four flows.
After you have done that, then you would list "What evil purposes are connected with
(whichever was the largest read)?". If there were two reads, you would have to do it twice. If truth and data both read, you
take the largest read. "What evil purposes are connected with truth?", then R3R those out, four flows, of course. Then, "What
evil purposes are connected with data?" and R3R those out, four flows. (Everything you touch is four flows and you only run
the flows that read.) So, that completes the Vital Information Rundown.
After you have done that, you are going to do your rock-slams handling which is called
the Responsibility Rundown. This is where you take each one of these statements and you handle them in the order that they
occurred in the folder off the sheets where you pulled the purps. It is best to write them down with a coloured pen. You take
up the first statement and read it back to the pc and ask, "What terminal or subject is all this material on?" and they will
tell you. What you do then is list for four flows of evil purposes connected with the subject or terminal. It is best with
a terminal according to L. Ron Hubbard: I have found that it is best with a subject. Let's say that they are RSing on "their
father". You would set up an L & N (List & Null) question to get the purp and your four questions would be:
On each of these they will list down to the purp which would blow down, FN, and cog.
You give it then to the pc and he will concur and it will blow down, FN again and cognition's will come off, this is a normal
||What evil purpose has your father had towards you?|
||What evil purpose have you had towards your father?|
Then, list for your third flow and this depends on how bright your pc is. If your pc
still looks, talks, and acts like the subject, and has not suspected that all four flows of this evil are his own, then you
are going to have to check it. Your best procedure is to use the meter to just check the third flow. See which is the best
way to list this.
||What evil purpose has your father had towards others?|
purpose have you had towards others regarding your father?
Whichever one reads the best, list off of. You're pc may not have caught on yet that
all four of these evil purposes are his own and he has had them superimposed across some innocent father. He may not realise
that until it is all run out. However, you would list off the one which read the best and get the item.
Your next action would be to list off the fourth flow. Like-wise, you should check
two questions here and list off the best reading one.
||What evil purpose has your father had towards himself? or What evil purpose
have you had towards yourself regarding your father?|
Whichever one reads best, you would list from.
Now that you have all four evil purposes listed out, you then sit down and R3R each
of these evil purposes out, four flows each, running only the flows that read, of course. So, you have a maximum of 16 engram
runs and a minimum of four. Many times these things can disintegrate on the first flow run per purp. After that is done, you
check the subject of "your father" on the meter and it is all cleaned up.
If you have what I call a lock RS (it's not a trunk, it's not the basic one), it will
only RS on one of these particular four flows. If you have the RS on the case going, then he will RS on each of the
four purps and he will be RSing in running the basic engram on each of the purps, Each one of the purps will RS. If
you see that phenomena, then you know that you have the one on the case.
So, then you continue through the rest of your list of Ev Purps that you have taken
out of the folder and run off all the RSes that are on the case. That should complete the Responsibility Rundown and they
certainly will get cogs on their own responsibility once all the rock slams are off. These rock slams have just been killing
them. An unhandled rock slam on a case will kill your pc and keep him crazy. I guarantee you that he is 50% nuts if he rock
slams in auditing, It is about the fastest change per minute auditing you can do.
In the unlikely event, you are not auditing XDN and RSes turn on severely in session
and they just won't run off at all, they are preventing you from auditing, you can go ahead and list these four purps then
(early), if your pc looks up to it, and that will key a rock slam out until the R3R is done. There is great relief just off
There will be big cogs on responsibility and big relief in getting it done, because
a rock slam is a pc convulsing in and out of the body. It is just shaking his space and him, and it is causing him to be irresponsible.
After that is done, you then do the Wants Handled Rundown. You simply ask the pc if
there is anything that he wants to get rid of. Anything that he comes up with you run it out using the appropriate processes.
If it doesn't clean up with processes and he lists a terminal or subject, you go ahead and L & N for the intention connected
with the terminal or subject. Then, R3R the intention, whether evil or not.
Then, your next action would be Multiple Flow Evil Impulse Rundown. All you do here
is list on four flows, get the item and run it out.
||What evil impulse has another had towards you?|
||What evil impulse have you had towards another?|
||What evil impulse has another had towards others?|
||What evil impulse have you had towards yourself?|
If your pc still has not made the right side or made an XDN EP, you then list for repeating
overts and the intentions connected with them and R3R them both out. List down to the item, (the overt), then list for the
purpose connected with it. You R3R the overt, then R3R the purpose only after you have listed both. It is a two step L &
N. The order is critical. Do your two L & Ns first on each flow and then do the two R3Rs of the two chains. If you R3R
out the overt early, it is not even going to be there to list from, and what you really want is the underlying purp. So, the
L & N questions are:
||What repeating overt has another committed on you on track?|
evil purpose is connected with (that overt)?
||What repeating overt have you committed on track?|
What evil purpose
is connected with (that overt)?
||What repeating overt has another committed on others on track?|
evil purpose is connected with (that overt)?
||What repeating overt have you committed on yourself on track?|
evil purpose is connected with (that overt)?
There is no one around that isn't going to make an XDN completion by doing all these*.
They normally make it by the time the rock slams are done or shortly thereafter. So, then you get an attestation. *One case
in 500 may need "Metalosis R/D" covered later in this book.
The only remarks I have on XDN is that it is a little tough on the auditor's body.
You can be an XDN completion yourself, but some of these charges are extremely nauseating for a meat body and a GE. So, until
you get used to running this stuff, I wouldn't suggest having anything in your stomach prior to auditing. The charges are
huge and the material is kind of unbelievable. I also suggest you charge a premium for doing this kind of work. It's quite
excruciating on ones body as these are perhaps the most gory incidents on the track.
The pcs don't have much trouble running them; they know that the material is there,
they are quite conscious of it. It is a difficult run if they haven't had a Drug Rundown before it, because a pc who can't
run engrams either has misunderstoods on the commands or it is the drugs holding them back from running engrams. Ironically,
a pc is able to run engrams connected with the drugs because that is what he is stuck in. He will automatically run them,
once he understands the meanings of the words.
Drug Rundown auditing is probably the easiest auditing that there is because it is
automatic. The mind, the bank, the GE, the body, and the person, (the whole kit and caboodle over there holding the cans)
wants those drugs and the engrams connected with them out, and so it just runs beautifully. Occasionally, you will encounter
a preclear who can't go back track and that is because they are druggies or in the middle of some huge secondary on someone
passing on, something of this order. So, this is handled by either running the secondaries or the Drug Rundown itself.
I've read of, but never personally met, someone having trouble running back track,
in other words, past lives. I have read that such people exist. I have never met anyone who has had any difficulty running
past lives, but in case one ever did, I suppose the remedy for it would be clearing the axioms very well and asking them what
was their favourite childhood movie or book and erasing that off. You would simply ask for attitudes and emotions and ideas
connected with the past lives and run out their objections to remembering, however, they have that worded, just erase it off,
and then, I am sure that past lives would turn on full bloom.
So, it is best to have the Drug Rundown done for a clean run on XDN, but the only XDN
one would do as they walked in the door crazy would be the Introspection Rundown. You wouldn't do these actions that I have
just listed here initially.
There are a couple of exceptions to that, ironically, because you do XDN on someone
has evil coming off in the folder. You can deliver it to resolve a number of conditions on people. If a person is a suppressive,
you can clear that up with XDN. If they are prone to roller coaster, you can clear that up with XDN. Many times physical illness
can be cleared up with XDN. So, you have to know why you are doing thing. It is the only part or element of the technology
which resolves psychosis and delivers sanity. The rest of the Scientology processes will not produce it and Expanded Dianetics
does produce it.
It has come in and out of vogue over the last four or five years. I guess that it is
cancelled now. The whole thing started in 1966, February 3rd when yours truly R3Red out 5 flows of evil (and wrote Mr. Hubbard
about it) and used rudiments and L & N processes and flows together with engram runs on S & D terminals. In other
words, I developed the PTS R/D down at the same time. I received an acknowledgement for my letter and then seven years later
he came out with this subject over his signature. Both of them, the PTS Rundown and Expanded Dianetics. I suppose he made
$100 million, and I suppose he put it in gold, and I suppose he has $1 billion out of this. I would rather understand how
it works and be able to do it, then have the billion dollars. I think justice has been served well in this matter. That is
the true origin of Expanded Dianetics and the PTS Rundown.
I don't think that they will ever get them done right in the churches because the churches
wouldn't even exist in their present form or with their present populations, if any clean XDN was done. Of course, that is
impossible because they don't know how to do the other material either. They never had a case properly set up to do XDN. There
are few other innuendoes which never give them an opportunity to: there are about 500 things that Hubbard never figured out
properly that prevented him from ever seeing this stuff work correctly. He never saw whether XDN worked well or not because
he never provided the proper set up.
Before you would ever run XDN on anyone, it requires not only a 53 Long Form be done,
the lists be corrected, and the Drug Rundown done properly, but there is one very, very critical step that technically has
to be done prior to doing XDN and that is the PTS Rundown. It should always be done to get the effect side of this aberration
handled completely, to where they have enough responsibility to where they can do XDN. I don't think that he ever tried it
that way using that as a prerequisite.
Even more important, the Introspection Rundown should be done. On the Introspection
Rundown a person will rise above thinking and he won't have to be introverted anymore and won't have to this anymore, he will
rise above that particular habit and phenomena.
Unless a person's Introspection Rundown is done, there is no way he is going to give
off all of his evil and erase all of his evil. If a person didn't have any evil, there probably wouldn't be anything to think
about, and thinking itself is an evil activity because it is low on the scale. Looking is far higher, knowing is higher, emoting
is higher, effort is higher. It is a surprising idea that your blue collar worker out there, your plumber, is in a higher
state than your college professor, but perhaps that will explain why your college professor has taken such great care in making
sure that no one ever finds out any truth. That is not a cynical, critical remark. I haven't met an educator that wanted any
truth discussed. They will entertain it, but they don't want it discussed to any resolution. There have been some good educators,
but unfortunately, they don't stay employed at educational institutions for very long.
So, since the proper set up for XDN is an Introspection Rundown, we will be taking
that up now. Although, Mr Hubbard ended up with a lot of money off this material, he never got XDN run on himself, and never
saw XDN run on anyone else, even on a research basis; for he never used the Introspection Rundown as a set up for XDN. He
never understood that unless the person extroverts completely and gives up introversion, listing and thinking as a way of
life, he won't give off all of his evil, That is why Expanded Dianetics has never been perceived or used adequately in any
other quarters than my particular surroundings.
So, let's take up the Introspection Rundown. If someone comes in and after you have
done the Life Repair, they complain or volunteer that they are crazy and that is what they want handled, you can and should
assess these different technologies or products on a meter or on a 2WC (two way comm.) basis, just call it an interview. You
ask them, "Do you want this mechanical, robotic aspect of your life handled?" "Do you want your drugs, being a freak handled?"
"Do you want your touchiness handled?" "Do you want your nuttiness handled?" "Do you want your stupidity handled?". You ask
If they come real clean and say "I'm crazy", I want that handled, and that is what
reads and blows down best on the meter, then do the Introspection Rundown. It is really pretty easy to do, and it is somewhat
complicated and highly technical auditing. It does require more skill than anything else that I know of in auditing. It needs
quite a bit of study to wade through all the paperwork, but if you will draw it out on a sheet of paper, it is actually quite
simple. You give the person the R-factor that you are going to give them an Introspection Rundown. Then, you draw out three
lines on a sheet of paper, going up and down and you can draw some horizontal lines. The first thing you will ask them is
that "You are looking for three points of psychotic breaks in this lifetime." They say they had one last year with the wife,
you say OK. Then they will say "I had one when I was 16 as a teenager." The third one you want is real critical and they may
volunteer four. You are looking for one real early in life, hopefully their first, no later than age 7 or 8. If they give
you one in the teens, you may be forced into taking it, but if the pc is pretty wise, he will give you an early one. He will
say "I was 5 and looking at the stars and wondering about life." Write down ever word of what he says on these three. Acknowledge
The next thing you do is make indications to him. You say, "I'd like to indicate that
it was this first one here, last year with the wife, that the substance of it was as a point of introversion and charge has
been by passed on that." It will blow down and FN. Way over to the left, you can put on this second column of handling, in
other words, you put another horizontal line down, first point indication. You can write IND and put a circle around it for
indication, as your indicating by-passed charge here. So, then you say, "I'd like to indicate when you were 16 as a teenager
the substance of it was that charge was by-passed as a point of introversion." He understands the meaning of that and it will
blow down and FN and you put a check in the little box. Then, you do the same thing for the third point.
The next thing you do is re describe these three things. You say, "On this first one
last year with the wife, what would you call such an incident?" He'd say, "Oh, it's a terrible depression." You would mark
the read on that. So, then you go to the second one, the 16 as a teenager, and get him to re describe that and he'll say,
"Couldn't stand it anymore." You write that in the box. So, then, you go to the third one when he was 5 and say, "What would
you call such an incident?" After he looks at it for awhile, he will tell you what he would call it, say "Great fear of mystery."
Draw a line under that. Write 2WC over to the left.
Now you are going to 2WC each one of these on four flows. You write 2WC and under that
you write F1, F2, F3, and F0. So, you do the 2WCs. You say, "Tell me about another causing you terrible depression." He does.
You can use other 2WC questions such as "How do you feel about that?" "How does it seem to you now?" Anyway, you 2WC that
to an EP. So, then you 2WC the second flow (F2), -Tell me about you causing another terrible depression. You 2WC that to a
key-out, F/N. So, then you go to F3, "Tell me about another causing others terrible depressions." Then, F0, "Tell me about
you causing yourself terrible depression." and get a key-out there.
Then, you 2WC the "can't stand it anymore" on four flows, put a check mark in that
box. Then you 2WC the "great fear of mystery" on four flows. After that is done, you go down about an inch and draw another
The next thing you are going to do is run out these incidents R3R on four flows and
what you are going to run out is these re description wordings So, you are going to run four flows R3R of "terrible depression",
as "Locate an incident of another causing you terrible depression." I hope the other flows would be obvious. After that is
done, then you R3R the four flows of "Can't stand it anymore", and then "Great fear of mystery". Then, you draw another horizontal
line, we are halfway down the page now, and write the word subject over on the left.
Ask for the subject connected with the first one, "last year with the wife", terrible
depression and he will give you something like "women". Make sure it BD FNs. If he can't come up with a subject that reads
like hell, you can L & N for it, but I have never had to. If you just ask for the subject, they will give you the subject,
it will just read like mad. So, as soon as he has given you the subject, you acknowledge it and call the FN.
Then, ask about the "16 as a teenager, couldn't stand it anymore". On that one, "What
was the subject matter connected with this introversion?" He tells you "responsibility". On this "5 years old wondering about
life which turned out to be a graet fear of mystery what subject was that?" He will say "The universe."
Now, if they come up with two subjects, both of which read like hell, write down the
reads on both and take them both. Likewise, if they come up with two redescriptions that read like hell, write both of them
down and 2WC them both and R3R them both. One of these three introversions could possibly break into two redescriptions. If
it does, you are going to have four columns proceeding down in these developing area.
Let's say in this session you are running, the guy tells you the subject matter is
the univeres and it LFBDs (blows down) and FNs and then he cognites the other subject matter was "people" and it LFBDs and
FNs. You had better take them both. So, now you have four subjects listed across. Draw a horizontal line.
Come down about an inch and to the left write out L & N because what you are going
to do now is do four L & Ns because you have four subjects. So, you would list off "What evil purpose is connected with
women (or the subject of women, either way you want to doit)?" So, he gets down to his item and gives it to you. Drop down
another inch and write E/P on the left for Ev Purp. Then you write the item "to make all women hurt".
Then, you go to the next L & N and say, "On the subject of responsibility, what
evil purpose is connected with the subject or responsibility?" Then, you write the purp down "to be irresponsible" as an example.
Then, you do the last two. You'd bring two arrows down, you'd L & N for the Ev Purp connected with "the universe". say
the item is "to destroy matter", you write that down. Then, you would list on "What evil purpose is connected with the subject
of people?" Say that is "to drive them nuts." These are typical items that will come up. This guy is going to be nuts if he
is busy trying to do it to others. Draw the last horizontal line.
Your next step is, you can write R3R over on the left under purp, to run these purps
on four flows R3R. Fl, F2, F3 and F0, you just check them off as you run them. So, after that is done you will normally have
what I call the first EP of the Introspection Rundown.
Normally the rundown will EP at that time. There is a good way to find out, and that
is to word clear subjective and objective at this point out of the dictionary and word clear introversion, introspection and
extroversion. Then run these two commands alternately:
Put your attention on something subjective.
Put your attention on something
If they can't put it on anything subjective, that is the end of the rundown. This is
normally what happens. You take an attestation at this point and that is a done deal.
If that isn't what happens, if they don't achieve the EP here, what you do is assess
ARC breaks and if it doesn't read, then assess withholds and if it doesn't read, then assess overts, and if it doesn't read,
assess -not saying, and if it doesn't read, assess false incidents, and if it doesn't read, assess, (in other words, calling
on the E-meter), false invalidation, and if it doesn't read, hit for no reason Let's say the last one read, Prom the way we
will be handling this, it should be logical how you would handle any of the others.
You'd 2WC with the pc "Has anyone else hit you for no reason?" 2WC this to F/N. Then,
you would 2WC to FN "Have you hit anyone else for no reason?", "Has another hit others for no reason?", "Have you gotten yourself
hit for no reason?" After the 2WC handling, you R3R the item. The commands would be: "Locate an incident of another hitting
you for no reason." I trust you can figure out the other three flows. After you have R3Red the four flows of this item, then
L & N for the intention behind the hitting of others for no reason. After you have L & Ned and have the purp out in
the open, then R3R the purp on four flows.
Going back over these others, say that they had a read on ARC breaks. You would 2WC
ARC breaks to F/N and of course, if these things don't 2WC, you take them earlier, that is the general rule of auditing. Then,
you would R3R out ARC breaks on four flows and of course, you would L & N for the intention behind causing ARC breaks.
So, continuing our hypothetical example, if hit for no reason didn't read, or let's
say that you have already cleaned that up, then you check for invalidated beingness, and if that didn't read, then you check
validated beingness, and if that didn't read, you check invalidated intentions.
After you have gone through these particular steps, you then do ARC breaks of long
duration to raise the pc's reality, That is simply doing four flows of ARC breaks using the phrase "long duration". The four
|"Has another caused you to have an ARC break of long duration?"|
you caused another to have an ARC break of long duration?"
"Has another caused others to have ARC breaks of long duration?"
you caused yourself to have an ARC break of long duration?"
Then, you 2WC recent actions, just get them to talk about their recent things that
they have done. If you get any overt that comes off, that reads well, you take the best reading overt and simply run repetitive
"What about that (and mention the overt) could you take responsibility for?" to EP.
Your next step would be to go through everything you have done on this rundown and
pull off all the Ev Purps that they have listed and audit those off. If they still haven't made it, you would handle any RSes
that had come up during the rundown in the method described as RS or Responsibility Rundown handling in the XDN section.
The next thing you do, as far as making this rundown complete, is run general O/Ws
(overts/withholds) on the subject of their life. The commands are:
|"What have you done to your life?"|
"What have you withheld from your
After that, if it reads well, you can run alternately to EP:
|"What have you done to yourself?"|
"What have you withheld from yourself?"
The last action you do is some succumb handling. If succumb reads, then you 2WC four
flows of it. You then R3R the four flows of succumbing, and then L & N for the Ev Purp behind wanting to succumb, and
Then, you 2WC if they have ever wanted to commit suicide. If so, R3R it on four flows
and then, you L & N for the intention behind the effort to commit suicide and R3R the Purp.
Then, there is a catch all question at the end. You 2WC with the person, watching closely
for a read, -Is there some other way you are doing yourself in that has been missed? If they give you an item, then R3R it
and then, list for the intention behind it and R3R that. You can work this last one over and over a few times until you get
an EP on the Introspection Rundown.
You come up with pretty wild material, this is extremely powerful on this catch all
question. Normal type material that comes off of a preclear when you ask them, "Is there any other way you are doing yourself
in that has been missed?", they will come off with "I'm making sure that I and everyone else is happy." Sounds confusing,
you should remember that the guy is a little nuts. You should go ahead and R3R that out because when you L & N for the
purp, "What evil purpose is behind keeping yourself and everyone happy?" he'll come up with stuff like "So the killing can
go on, that people don't notice that they are dying", in other words, the guy has an intention for the killing to go on or
that people not notice that they are dying.
I might add that if they do make the EP of the Introspection Rundown, initially after
you have run off these three hot spots in the lifetime and brought it to their attention by running objective and subjective
attention on them, that you can come back a year later (or later) in their particular folder and do the rest of these steps
with considerable case gain.
In doing it as a set up for XDN, it is all right to take the first EP. Then, later
in the folder do the balance of it. So, that is the Introspection Rundown, probably the technical paragon of all of L. Ron
He used it on about 30 test cases, on very crazy people, people that were in asylums,
to get them out of asylums and as a research tool, but as far as using it in the churches, there were less than 24 of them
done successfully and it was priced out of the market in that it was $12,000 $16,000 for 12 hours of this type of auditing.
It's over-$1,000-an-hour price precluded people buying the best thing available.
It should be done on anyone that gets any XDN. The irony of it is people believe their
social machinery, and the Scientology cult itself is full of people that play little social games, and they consider the Introspection
Rundown is for crazy people. I consider anyone on this planet at this particular time to be extremely crazy.
After one has had an Introspection Rundown, they are no longer crazy. It doesn't mean
that they are going to move from the planet. There are certain events that have occurred in this part of the galaxy and in
this galaxy as a whole, on the back track, that make it extremely clear that there are psychotic breaks on anyone that is
holding the cans, and it is just a question of how soon your preclear is going to come up to recognising it.
Using this rundown on a normal or above normal person will produce gains beyond their
wildest imaginings. I would really hate to waste it on someone who was actually quite crazy. It requires a certain amount
of depth and intelligence to run. Occasionally you will find this type of material surfacing on other rundowns and you should
just let it turn on and turn off because when you get to this rundown, it is going to come off properly. So much for the Introspection
I might add that it is good to set up a worksheet with little boxes on it before you
start your session. There are three heavy introspection points in any lifetime. You just put INSP PT over on the left, and
then draw a line; under that you put IND Bpc, and draw a line; under that you put REDESCRIBED, draw a line and under that
you put 2WC and under that you put Q R3R; under that you put SUBJECT; under that you put L & N; under that you put PURPs
and under that you put R3R PURP. This just gives you a table. Put the person's name up in the upper left and the date on the
right and just check off what you have done and that way you don't get lost in what you are doing.
In doing these lists, (I might as well cover listing and nulling (L & N) here),
I don't know of anymore simple subject that has been made more complicated that the subject of L & N.
I would just be horrified if someone would actually take time and read what L. Ron
Hubbard has written on this subject. He just goes on and on about one of the simplest things in the world, I would like to
define, describe, and tell you what L & N is to where you can do it and not train you in know about basically. The real
problem with L. Ron Hubbard is he knows about Scientology, but he doesn't know any Scientology.
Anyone that is in know about on any subject is doomed, absolutely doomed. You can't
create or control or be responsible unless you know. KRC is the create triangle. If you know about, you are kind of a college
professor. Hubbard certainly knows about Scientology, he knows all about it, but he doesn't know any of it. There is a tremendous
difference between knowingness and know about. So, unfortunately, there has been very little knowingness transmitted, if any,
to anyone by him and a whole lot of know about has been transmitted instead.
So, I'd like to take up the subject of L & N here and put it to bed for all times
for anyone that is interested. You need to know how to do it, of course, to audit grades and do these XDN actions, so it is
a proper time to define what it is and explain whatever nuances are necessary to where a person can do it all day long.
The most rapid case gain that you can accomplish on a pc comes from doing L & N
actions. Conversely, if you make an error, you can mess up a case and ruin an individual, if you do a L & N action wrong.
Out lists take priority, (in other words, are more important), than out rudiments, and if people can't get any better over
out ruds and can't audit or live over out ruds if they are walking around with out lists it is even worse, because they are
dramatising the wrong item off a list and still stuck back with that list. So, you don't make errors on lists, you do them
It is beyond me how such a simple subject could be made so complex, but Mr Hubbard
did so. He published over 100 hour-long tapes on this subject and wrote hundreds, if not thousands, of pages on it. People
spent months hearing those tapes and reading those books about something which probably takes about, hopefully, about 10 minutes
Hubbard is not a bad man, he is what he is. He is simply an egotistical researcher
and I would also like to state that no man has a right to copyright truth. He has been dealing with a lot of truth and technology
and has summarised a lot of things that were already published under other names. It would not be difficult to take every
sentence that he has ever written and wade through the library and find out where it has been said before. So, the fact that
he summarises the collective thought of Western and Oriental wisdom, and the Golden Scripts material (out of the monasteries)
and publishes it, and says that no one has the right to speak on the subject but me, no one has a right to data, to help their
fellow man, except with my approval and if you do I'll sick my dogs on you. That is where he's at. People from his "Guardians
Office" have gone to people' houses and beat people up. That is where he's at. It's sick.
There is no legal basis for monopoly on truth. Truth belongs to all men. Within the
confines of him having people running around in ministers suits applying his writings to others, I'm sure he has all kinds
of legal jurisdiction, but as far as my right to speak on this subject, I have found as a scientist that I can produce results
100 times better than he can with different techniques, through a simply understanding of knowing what is correct.
I have put these ideas in a logical order of importance in a wise, applicable form.
He himself stated that a person should know and have the correct technology as a first step. He never attained that particular
step and no one in his organisation has attained that particular step, therefore they have skipped gradient phenomena. I pleaded
with him to withdraw that particular bulletin about Keeping Scientology Working because it placed on the individual, whoever
did know and have the correct technology, they would have to close the doors on incorrect application as the final procedure
that is listed in the bulletin. I warned him and pleaded with him in 1966, that the bulletin should be withdrawn because if
someone were to accidentally later figure out, know, and have the correct Scientology technology, they would be obligated,
out of responsibility and love for their fellow man, to close the doors on incorrect application which happens to be him and
his church. He felt that that possibility was laughable and that no one, and I'm quoting the conversation now, "that no one
could ever know more about Scientology than I do". To which I said "I do already." To which he said "Good day" and walked
out of the room. Although I respect his work and his contribution, I don't think that I care for the man too much.
I don't think he cares for me too much, in fact, I'm quite aware of it. We have had
a personality conflict. Mankind perhaps would of been better served had we never physically met, in that neither lifetime
recovered, and both ships got blown off their life course due to that encounter. Be that as it may, in his own study tapes,
he pronounces (and any person speaking logically on this subject would realise) that the true authority in an area would be
the person who could produce results. In that I can produce results between 20 - 100 times in excess of what his opinions
are on this subject, my technology not only will prevail it already has.
There are Moseses throughout history and they serve history's purpose and also mankinds'
purpose. I'm sure that someone quite wiser, brighter, better and kinder will come along and replace me, and I will be a nobody,
and I look forward to that day, because I like progress for all of us and I'd like to see an improvement on my work. I have
been waiting for that for 15 years and I don't see anyone moving in that direction. So, I have come forward and made a statement
because it seems an appropriate time. These are relevant remarks as I know lists and Hubbard does not. He dramatises them.
Listing is simply the procedure where the auditor writes a listing question down on
a sheet of paper, a separate sheet of paper from his worksheets, and checks the question on the E-meter. He asks the pc if
he understands it, and then gives the question to the pc. The auditor then writes down the answers or the items that the pc
has said in response to the question in the exact sequence that they are given. That is all listing is.
You should note the TA, the position of the tone arm at the beginning of the list.
The pc is basically emptying the file there. So, say the listing question is "What do you want the most for dinner?". The
pc says, "Eggs, bacon, chicken", looks up at you and says "That's all". What you do at that particular point is say "I'd like
to extend the list" and draw a line about two or three inches long under their last answer. So, they may reflect on it a little
more and say "I'd like enchiladas" and they will list more answers "Chicken Chow Mein, roast beef, pineapples with cantaloupes
cut all around the outside and ground up coconuts in a bed of lettuce with a small serving of tapioca pudding in the middle,
some Swiss chess laid around the sides, and so forth, that would be the perfect dinner, that is what I want the most." If
it does not blow down and FN at that point acknowledge them graciously and say "I'd like to extend the list." If it does blow
down and F/N, then indicate "That completes the list" (say that to your preclear). Draw a circle around the item.
Say "I'd like to indicate your item is the pineapple surrounded by the slices of melon
. . . ", read it all back to them, give him his item. It should blow down and FN a second time and he should get a cognition
and brighten up. If that doesn't happen, then you are going to have to go back and null the list.
Nulling a list is defined as the auditor's action in saying items from a list to a
pc and noting the reaction of the pc's bank by use of the E-meter. That is rare that this will happen. Normally a pc will
list down to the item and you simply give it back to him. It will blow down and FN and he will cognite and that is all there
is to it.
If a pc lists a number of answers, you are marking the reads as he is listing each
of these off, and all of a sudden the needle starts floating, you are going to have to call the whole list marking the reads
as you are calling them. If you are left with three reads, you would then null further and call those three. Say one of the
reads disappeared, leaving you two, you would the call those two and one of the reads would disappear. So, now you are down
to one read, so then you would give the pc that item. It should blow down, FN and cog when you give it to them. If that doesn't
work, then you go back and extend the list. That's about all there is to this subject.
95% of the time all you have to do is keep extending the list. If the pc starts getting
into a lock, starts ARC breaking, no matter what happens, just keep extending it, and you will get the blow down, FN item.
Normally, if you allow the pc to list, don't make a tremendous big deal about it, they come up with the item very quickly.
Conversely, some pc's will have to list quite a bit, quite a while, it may take 45 minutes, there may be as many as 30 pages,
20 items per page. You may have a 45 minute, 600 line list they will finally find the item. You will find this going on in
XDN. If you get a long list like that, it is just fabulous, absolutely fabulous because you will probably get the central
purpose which has caused all the other ones, you may have an XDN completion if that phenomena occurs.
All there is to Listing and Nulling (L & N) is checking the question for a read,
marking your TA position, clearing it to where they understand it, giving them the question and getting them to list it. If
they start running away from the list simply draw a line on your worksheet and say "I'd like to extend the lis"t, confronting
them, let them just freely list them out, keep extending until you get a blow down, FN item. It is very rare that you will
have to come back and do any nulling. If you do, all it is is calling the list off, watching the reads fall off the form and
if you come down with just a few reads, just call them off. If the whole list goes null, you could come back and put suppress
and inval in on the list and find the item, but it is very dangerous to go that far, very dangerous.
It is best to just extend down to the Blow down, FN item. If the pc has difficulty
listing, there is something grossly wrong with the case. It should be an easy, pleasurable, fascinating, enjoyable activity
for them. You can clear up this, make sure his rudiments are in. You should never list over out ruds. If they get out ruds
while you are listing, it is a little late. Out lists take precedence over out ruds and while he is listing you have an out
list. So, if you have one of these snotty preclears, say someone worked at Flag or something, in other words, a super-superficial
being, who says "Well, I'm ARC broken", well, who gives a damn. You have an unflat list. You just get them to extend the list.
You can always clean up the ARC break after they get their item on the list, You are not forcing the pc, you are simply getting
the list done. You simply say, "I'd like extend the list" to where they give it to you.
Now, the reason you mark you tone arm position at the beginning is whatever the item
that they give you at the end, the TA should be at the same position as at the beginning of the list or at a lower range.
If it is higher and the needle is floating, extend the list, they have gone by something. You can use that prompter, but use
it sparingly. "Have you gone by something or thought of some that that you didn't put on the list?" If that reads chase it
down and get it listed.
You should tell your pc prior to listing that they should print everything that
comes through their minds and that their minds work at 1200 words per minute and that they only talk at 200 words per minute,
so it is in their best interest that they connect their mind to their mouth since it is costing them money to do this. Their item has to have the same read you noted in checking the question for a read. Thus, a 4 year old can do it.
So, that's about all there is to listing. I can't think of anything else. Hubbard has
got laws on L & N and even an incredibly lengthy technology on how to fix screwed up lists, I don't believe in, don't
tolerate, and I don't think anyone else should become involved with bad lists.
Those laws and rules for L & N are wrong. One shouldn't use them because they are
just bad news. One of the most absurd laws is if a pc says it is his item, it is his item. I have found just the opposite
to be true, Many a preclear will say, "Oh, gee, that's my item" and they are just grinning with glee while they are selling
you and themselves some bullshit. (Of course, the TA is in a higher position then when they started the list and of course,
the needle is more active and it is just a sell.) You know it is 'service-facsimile time', and that is all that is going on.
So, you need to list the list down to a BD FN item and there is no point in my saying
it a million times, but that is all it is. You just extend if they haven't got it. As far as putting suppress and inval in
on the list, that is absolutely asinine. There is no way that a pc is going to be capable of suppressing the actual item.
What you are doing here is auditing, not playing a cat and mouse game with the preclear.
So, L & N is an intention-without-reservation activity on the part of the auditor.
It is Tone 40 auditing. If you do it Tone 40, you will never have any problems with it. If you don't do a Tone 40, if you
don't keep extending, and take any bullshit from a pc, "So and so is my item, but I have it suppressed and blah blah", you'd
better fold up shop. That is just circuitry coming out of their reactive mind.
I took someone who had worked at Flag for 5 years, actually there were 3 of them, and
on all three of these preclears (which handled very high senior tech positions at the great religious retreat in Florida),
none of them had ever come near a list because they believed the laws of listing and nulling and believed a lot of other garbage.
One of them ask me for a demonstration of doing a drug list, and I said, "All right,
pick up the cans." He picked them up and I said "What emotions are connected with taking cough syrup?" and the guy started
running locks, So, I said, "Hey, we are not here to run locks, we are here to run a file, we are listing out what emotions
are connected with taking cough syrup." He said "Hell, I'm ARC broken now, I'm not going to list over an ARC break." I said,
"Well, out lists take priority over out ruds, we can clean up your ARC break later. What emotions are connected with taking
cough syrup?" The guy started listing things for 45 minutes and I'm getting 2 division blow downs on "agony" and "suffering".
So, after he give me 40 reading emotions, he looks up and says, "-I never had a Drug Rundown, I've never really been in session."
I said, "Well, we will take care of that ARC break also." So, it went on for another l0 - 15 minutes, so we got a complete
list, and in a sense it acted like a L & N action because it had a one division blow down at the end on "excruciating
spiritual pain" and he realised that that was why he had joined the Sea Org, because others had that. So, anyway, I closed
off the demonstration and he said, "So, that is how you do a list?" I said, "Yeah, if you are going to set out and do something,
you do it and TR 4 is TR 4, but good god, you don't screw around with L & N and play with locks, and talk about things,
you get answers to the questions." So, then I flew his ARC breaks in the order in which they occurred, of course, where he
ARC broke with me for chopping his lock, then I flew the ARC break of never having a Drug Rundown, and then I flew the ARC
break of having been in the Sea Org for 5 years off of a one division engram chain and the guy was just appalled, walking
around the house saying "Gee, someone should tell Hubbard. I thought you were a weirdo and an egomaniac and keyed into "only
one" implants, a lone ranger. I really thought you were nuts too, but this is unbelievable, getting a question answered. It's
just unbelievable." I said, "Well, don't you all do that somewhere in the church?" He said, "I've never heard of it." So,
the moral in telling this particular story is that listing is not complicated, it is the simplest thing in the world.
So, that is all there is to L & N. You shouldn't do any on anyone that hasn't had
their Life Repair PrepChecks which will clear off their 300 - 400 - 600 ARC breaks. It will clear off their misunderstoods
on existence which will key out their Dianetic bank. There is no way in hell anyone is going to run anything if they have
a pile of ARC breaks and you are not going to be doing L & N action on someone until you get to XDN or Grade III or Grade
IV or until you are doing an XGF (Expanded Green Form) which you could be doing early or doing a PTS Rundown, but it is nice
to know how to do one. If you are doing the Introspection Rundown, that is the first thing that gets done in spite of out
ruds. But hopefully, you won't be doing them over gross ARC breaks, and even if you are doing them over out ruds, if you just
get them to find the right file, and list the answers to the question then there is no problem to it. So, I don't see any
point in mocking up problems or laws or technology or ferocious over complication over a very simple subject. That is all
there is to listing. You ask a question, they give you the answers. The one that blows down, F/Ns and the room lights up,
you give them that as their item, and it will blow down, F/N again and they will cognite, and then the listing question doesn't
read anymore, and they haven't sold you a bowl of bullshit.
All these others errors in this whole technology that L. Ron Hubbard invented on L
& N were ways so that the auditor, the pc, and everyone else concerned could live with the lie that the auditor wasn't
capable of giving the pc enough time or repeating the listing question to get the truth and the pc was overwhelmed by the
area and so he wheezled.
Most of the areas, if not all, where you will be doing L & N, the pc will try to
wheezle, the bank will turn on. So, you might as well as an auditor manifest more theta (or more force, if you are low-toned
you will think that it is force, if you are high-toned, you will realise that it is theta), than the bank that you are addressing.
So, why not have it as a simple subject. Low-toned people can, even low-toned groups can.
The greatest gains in auditing have been completely obscured by anyone who has had
any L & N work done in a church. It's a broad generality, but unfortunately, it is a quite accurate one. Some good auditing
has gone on at churches, but I would assign that to 20% of the people coming in the door having very strong urges to get better
and they just make it go right in spite of the auditors, the C/S, and the weird laws of L & N. All right, so much for
L & N.
I'd like to move up the Grade Chart. I think we have covered everything on the lower
third of the Bridge. What we have next is Expanded Grades, So, we will take them up now.
The first grade is Expanded Grade 0. You are going to handle a lot more than communication
difficulties on this level. You are going to bring a being up to where they can recognise things. These grades are run to
produce a state of awareness and ability. People normally have at least one of the five parts of the comm. cycle in. Hopefully,
they will cognite on theirs in doing the TRs. You want to produce the awareness level of the grade that you are running. You
would run every process on Grade 0 to the awareness level of recognition, and you would run every process on Grade I - Problems
up to perception and communication and so forth.
These grades are in this order for a number of reasons. If a person can't communicate,
then they are going to have problems. If they have problems, then they are going to commit harmful acts. If they commit harmful
acts, then they are going to have upsets. If they have upsets, then they are going to have to use data as a substitute for
themselves (in living). So, you can see the flow going North up the grades. How something out on the lower grade will cause
the next grade up to go awry.
The same flow goes the other direction. Someone who is right (all the time) and making
other people wrong, is going to have upsets. If one upsets people and has upsets oneself, then they are going to be miserable
and commit harmful (overt) acts. If you do that, it is going to cause you problems, and if you have problems, you are not
going to talk.
Where you have truth flowing two directions, producing the same thing, you have what
is known as a mobius strip and that means that are very close to the nature of creation in respect to the physical universe.
This happens to be my own unique understanding of why these grades are arranged in this fashion.
Hubbard on a 1966 tape said it did not matter what order that they were run in.
This was the historical order that this data was put together about 25 billion years
ago. Hubbard is -into owned knowingness, just publishing stuff that is in old sacred books, and ideas coming off his own memory
track. They did get arranged in this particular, proper order after suggestions by myself, John McCoy, John McMasters and
a few other people were submitted to Hubbard.
They should be in a logical order of communication first. The comm. cycle difficulties
that an individual has (whether it is being there, speaking naturally, acknowledging, repeating when necessary on a cycle
of action) are important. Proper listing is just using TR 3 and TR 4. Use of TR 4 is ignoring comments in life and in session,
You should never address stuff aimed at you, or anything aimed at you, or validate it, even if it is a bullet, because it
is just going to turn on more back, thus more impact.
To the degree that you validate evil, you will get more evil. TR 4 also covers clarifying
origination's where they have been made to you and getting them understood and getting things back on their original track.
I have never met an individual who could naturally do all five of these things consistently. It is an excellent area to process,
but hopefully, this cleans up and off when they are doing their TRs. It is not directly addressed on Grade 0. On Grade 0 you
are trying to get someone up to recognising things. There is a lot out there to recognise but they don't know that. So, you
have to bring them up to the reality. Life is going on, they just aren't aware of it, no matter how much they profess they
are. You will be discovering that the moment you start running Grade 0.
There is an upper class, snotty little clique, not only that surrounds Scientology,
but is inherent throughout the Class 8 - 12 courses, which states that one is doing this whole load of Bridge to accomplish
certain actions that will make OT III run better. Their view of the lower Bridge is simply something one does to where one
can get to the OT levels where all the true improvement is going to occur. That is Class 8 Course chat. This has got to be
one of the most asinine ideas that I have ever heard because the majority of the case gain on any being is going to come off
this lower third of the Bridge that I have discussed and off doing these Expanded Grades for you are clearing up and making
someone happy and well on the lower third and then you are making them able and aware on your second third, the Grades. Your
upper Bridge, in other words, the OT levels, Clearing Course, is going to take off the fundamental implants, masses and inability's
as a thetan that they adopted. These occurred to individuals on a group level, but as fsr as raising their individual awareness,
the grades are going to do that. So, these church snots have this inverted and an eagle's nest view of the lower Bridge which
is extremely destructive. OT technology should be applied on OTs. These things stand alone. Grades stand alone to improve
In starting Grade 0, the first thing you run is R2-31 out of Creation of Human Ability,
page 74. You have the pc: Look around the room and discover some object which he doesn't mind being present. Then, you have
him locate something else that he wouldn't mind being present. You keep this up to an EP.
Whatever you get on the first process is somewhat quasi-irrelevant, they are going
to come up to recognising that they have objections and that they have classifications of things being present or not. You
should run it to at least that EP.